Return-Path: XPUM04@prime-a.central-services.umist.ac.uk
Received: from G.SEI.CMU.EDU by ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.3)
        id AA04604; Wed, 20 Jun 90 17:35:08 -0400
Received: from SEI.CMU.EDU by g.sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.5)
        id AA07254; Wed, 20 Jun 90 17:35:08 -0400
Received: from nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.3)
        id AA23640; Wed, 20 Jun 90 17:35:04 -0400
Received: from sun.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by vax.NSFnet-Relay.AC.UK 
           via Janet with NIFTP  id aa23708; 20 Jun 90 16:32 BST
From: Anthony Appleyard <XPUM04@prime-a.central-services.umist.ac.uk>
To: DAVIDF@cs.heriot-watt.ac.uk
Date:         Wed, 20 Jun 90 16:39:12 BST 
Message-Id:   <$TGWGCZNQBTVW at UMPA>
Subject:      Virus-L vol 0 issue #1109



Virus-L Digest Wed, 9 Nov 88, Volume 0 : Issue #1109

Today's Topics

Virus class
Administrative announcement.

------------------------------

Date:         Wed, 9 Nov 88 09:01:44 EST
From:         "Prof Arthur I. Larky" <AIL0@LEHIGH>
Subject:      Virus class

>From:         Dimitri Vulis <DLV@CUNYVMS1>

>MIS week, vol 9, no 35 (aug 29 this year) had a first-page feature blasting
>the Computer Virus Industry Association and its leader John McAfee.
>(the later also runs the National Bulletin Board Society)
>There was also some negative stuff in PC WEEK.
>The article is pretty long; if there is sufficient interest, I'll key
>in a digest.
>By the way, this coming Friday I'm giving a talk in class about computer viri;
>are there any suggestions as to what I should say?
>-Dimitri

I suggest a good dose of ethics and why virii are  dangerous.  Last  week's
episode  was  a  good example of how even a 'benign' virus (worm, actually)
can cause major harm because the writer didn't  anticipate  its  effect  on
other  computers. The corolary to TINSTAAFL is: There Is No Such Thing As A
Safe Virus.

Art Larky, Lehigh University
Computer Science & Electrical Engineering Dept

--------------------

Date:         Wed, 9 Nov 88 11:16:26 EST
From:         Ken van Wyk <luken@SPOT.CC.LEHIGH.EDU>
Subject:      Administrative announcement.

Dear Readers:

In an effort to improve the quality  of  VIRUS-L,  I've  decided  to  start
digestifying  VIRUS-L.  Please  note  that it is not my intention to censor
submissions, merely to weed out  irrelevant  ones  (e.g.,  one-liners  like
"SIGNOFF  VIRUS-L",  ASCII  pictures  like  the  ones we all read recently,
identical submissions). Also, rest assured that VIRUS-L will continue to be
distributed in a timely manner. Urgent messages (virus warnings, etc.) will
be distributed as soon as possible, and  separately  from  actual  digests,
which  will  go out once a day, if any incoming mail exists. I hope that in
doing this, the quality of VIRUS-L will continue to improve. Note that  GNU
EMACS  (rmail)  users  can  undigestify  individual  digests  with  an "M-X
undigestify" command while reading their mail. As  always,  I  invite  your
comments  and  suggestions. This should be the last non-digestified message
(other than any future  urgent  announcements)  to  go  out.  Regards,  Ken

Kenneth R. van Wyk                   Calvin: (hammer hammer hammer ...)
User Services Senior Consultant      Mom: Calvin, what are you DOING to the
Lehigh University Computing Center        coffee table?!
Internet: <luken@Spot.CC.Lehigh.EDU> Calvin: Is this some sort of trick
BITNET:   <LUKEN@LEHIIBM1>                question?

--------------------

*** end of Virus-L issue ***
