Return-Path: XPUM04@prime-a.central-services.umist.ac.uk
Received: from G.SEI.CMU.EDU by ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.3)
        id AA04594; Wed, 20 Jun 90 17:34:42 -0400
Received: from SEI.CMU.EDU by g.sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.5)
        id AA07242; Wed, 20 Jun 90 17:34:43 -0400
Received: from nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.3)
        id AA23607; Wed, 20 Jun 90 17:34:34 -0400
Received: from sun.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by vax.NSFnet-Relay.AC.UK 
           via Janet with NIFTP  id aa23624; 20 Jun 90 16:30 BST
From: Anthony Appleyard <XPUM04@prime-a.central-services.umist.ac.uk>
To: DAVIDF@cs.heriot-watt.ac.uk
Date:         Wed, 20 Jun 90 16:37:32 BST 
Message-Id:   <$TGWGCZNQBTVG at UMPA>
Subject:      Virus-L vol 0 issue #1105



Virus-L Digest Sat, 5 Nov 88, Volume 0 : Issue #1105

Today's Topics

VMS/VAX
Re: Anti-Viral Software
Re: Debrain.exe
UUxxx files on the Listser
Re: Debrain.exe
Re: Debrain.exe
Re: debrain.exe & ftp...
Re: Anybody home?
DEBRAIN.EXE
** no subject, date = Sat, 5 Nov 88 14:18:54 EDT
Vfeature
Re: comments on EEV vs FEV
** no subject, date = Sat, 5 Nov 88 22:48:41 EST
FTP and BITNET

------------------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 00:31:55 GMT
From:         ZDEE731@ELM.CC.KCL.AC.UK
Subject:      VMS/VAX

Have any viruses been discovered on VMS/VAX?
Regards Bob (UK)
UK.AC.KCL.CC.ELM

--------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 11:07:56 EDT
From:         Jean Coppola <SSAT@PACEVM>
Subject:      Re: Anti-Viral Software
In-Reply-To:  Message of Mon, 31 Oct 88 00:23:41 EST from <DAB3@LEHIGH>

That would be a good idea to have it on the LISTSERV.
Also could someone explain how the UUxx programs work?

--------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 11:14:35 EDT
From:         SSAT@PACEVM
Subject:      Re: Debrain.exe
In-Reply-To:  Message of Mon, 31 Oct 88 10:23:02 EST from <SHERK@UMDD>

For those of us new to this, how do I get a file from umd5.umd.edu
over Bitnet?

--------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 12:17:40 EST
From:         "David A. Bader" <DAB3@LEHIGH>
Subject:      UUxxx files on the Listser

Since Bitnet mail can only transfer data as ascii, and not as binary,
there needs to be a method to send someone a binary file over Bitnet.
UUxxxs turn a binary file into a cryptic ascii file for this purpose.
The source code for UUENCODE (the sender's encoding program) and
UUDECODE (the receiver's decoding program) are readily available over
this Listserv and many other houses of public domain software.  For
using the particular version of UUENCODE or UUDECODE, you would have to
check the docs for that particular version.

          David Bader
          DAB3@LEHIGH

--------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 12:21:00 EST
From:         Jim Shaffer <SHAFFERJ@BKNLVMS>
Subject:      Re: Debrain.exe

>For those of us new to this, how do i get a file from umd5.umd.edu
>over Bitnet?

You don't.

* FLAME ON *
Bitnet is utterly incapable of supporting FTP, due to someone's decision
to ignore the well-established TCP/IP protocol way back when Bitnet was
founded.  I'm sure there was a good reason for this at the time (probably
money), but it makes us look like fools today and I'm sick and tired of it.
* FLAME OFF *

--------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 12:32:31 EDT
From:         SSAT@PACEVM
Subject:      Re: Debrain.exe
In-Reply-To:  Message of Sat, 5 Nov 88 12:21:00 EST from <SHAFFERJ@BKNLVMS>

Great so how does someone go about requesting debrain.exe from umd5.umd.edu

--------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 12:35:36 EST
From:         ENGNBSC@BUACCA
Subject:      Re: debrain.exe & ftp...

>You don't.

Not  necessarily.  BITNet  access  does  not  preclude   Internet   access!
Basically,  you have to find yourself a ftp-capable site (perhaps even your
own), and go get it - just log in as anonymous.

>good reason at the time (probably money)...

You're right - BITNet was (and in places  still  IS)  a  string  of  modems
talking  back  and  forth. In the early days, most of these links were 1200
baud modems... Primitive, yes - but (when the links are up :-( it gets  the
job  done.  So  you  can't ftp over it - with the instability of some of my
favorite links, I really wouldn't want to think about ftp...  besides,  how
would  you  like  to  try  to slurp a *REALLY* big file through a 1200 baud
modem with BITNet mail building up  on  either  side  of  it??  No  thanks.

Bruce Howells, engnbsc@buacca.bu.edu / engnbsc@buacca.BITNet
 - The opinions expressed above are mine, and do not necessarily
   represent those of Boston University, nor anyone else...

--------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 10:53:00 MST
From:         Bernie <BSWIESER@UNCAMULT>
Subject:      Re: Anybody home?
In-Reply-To:  Message of 2 Nov 88 07:28 MST from "Robert Slade"

Odd, I'm getting a whole bunch. In our  local  newspaper,  "Computer  virus
wreaks  U.S.  chaos"  hit the print. Greg LYPOWY was telling me this was an
SMTP virus. Anybody have any info. on this? I can't  really  think  of  how
this one would work, but Greg says it logs into SMTP and get's into a debug
shell  "?" and continues to trash the system. So much for no virus that can
go between machines! I does't sorta' make sense. Some systems SMTP is  just
a  dummy  account that runs something to handle sendmail. The one here used
to be so stupid as to have no password and anyone could just control-c  out
of  it  before  it  ran  the  program.  I gather if this virus were to then
'upload' some C code, compile it, propagate and  kill  itself,  that  would
work. Then it wouldn't have to be machine dependant. BUT whoever wrote such
a thing is not your average "cracker" or "hacker". I'd say a scientist with
a  vengeance.  Just goes to show admin. is stupid for not allowing research
on this topic. They're leaving themselves and the real world open  for  all
sorts  of  problems....  Just  like  environmental  issues.... If there's a
problem, ignore it, it'll just go away.... ha.

--------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 13:13:36 EDT
From:         Jean Coppola <SSAT@PACEVM>
Subject:      DEBRAIN.EXE

Can anyone tell me where DEBRAIN.EXE resides on Bitnet where it can
be requested from?

--------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 14:18:54 EDT
From:         SSAT@PACEVM

In a round about way I found an interesting situation. Vfeature Deluxe from
Golden Bow is for partitioning disks. However it  has  a  security  feature
called mount. When you password protect a drive you must mount it before it
can  be used. However even when mounted correctly, Vfeature stops low level
writes to the mounted drive, such as trying  to  use  Fastback  to  restore
files  to  the drive. I think this bears out more investigation. This might
be a way to protect a drive?

--------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 14:48:16 EST
From:         "David A. Bader" <DAB3@LEHIGH>
Subject:      Vfeature

I did not quite understand what exactly this "Vfeature" is or does. If
it is software, however, wouldn't there have to be another way with
software (e.g. a virus) to get around it?

    David Bader
    DAB3@LEHIGH

--------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 21:39:33 CDT
From:         Len Levine <len@EVAX.MILW.WISC.EDU>
Subject:      Re: comments on EEV vs FEV
In-Reply-To:  Message from "Ken van Wyk" of Nov 3, 88 at 10:02 am

The point I was trying to make with the FEV and the EEV was that the
fix for an EEV is to fix a problem.  The fix for an FEV is to remove
the feature, or live with the virus.

As an example, the recent UNIX virus depended in one respect on a
Feature of the sendmail program (debug) and not on an error.  The
debug feature was to powerful to leave in the system, UNIX worked just
like it should have and the virus got into the system.

+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
| Leonard P. Levine               e-mail len@evax.milw.wisc.edu |
| Professor, Computer Science             Office (414) 229-5170 |
| University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee       Home   (414) 962-4719 |
| Milwaukee, WI 53201 U.S.A.              Modem  (414) 962-6228 |
+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +

--------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 22:48:41 EST
From:         James Paterson <ACDJAMES@UOGUELPH>
In-Reply-To:  Message of Thu,
              3 Nov 88 13:01:00 CST from <troj@UMAXC.WEEG.UIOWA.EDU>

>From what I have seen of OS/2, it does not allow application programs
direct access to memory.  All requests are routed, and there is virtual
addressing capabilites.  I have read (In a book written by the development
team) that the virtual addressing is automatic, and should be completely
transparent to applications written for the operating system.

This could provide some protection against viruses, but the operating
system would have to make sure that the application would not alter
the exe file, which I don't think it monitors.

James Paterson
(ACDJAMES@UOGUELPH)

--------------------

Date:         Sat, 5 Nov 88 18:22:28 CST
From:         James Ford <JFORD1@UA1VM>
Subject:      FTP and BITNET

>>For those of us new to this, how do i get a file from umd5.umd.edu
>>over Bitnet?

>You don't.

>* FLAME ON *
>Bitnet is utterly incapable of supporting FTP, due to someone's decision
>to ignore the well-established TCP/IP protocol way back when Bitnet was
>founded.  I'm sure there was a good reason for this at the time (probably
>money), but it makes us look like fools today and I'm sick and tired of it.
>* FLAME OFF *

I'm not sure that this is correct.  I have been FTPing files for quite a
while from SimTel20, CUHUG and other places, and this is a BITNET node.
Perhaps your system isn't capable........  If you are able, here is
some FTP-available locations.

                         James Ford
                         jford1@ua1vm.BITNET

- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
The following format is the same for all numbers on this list.

Name ------------ CUHUG BBS
Number.string --- 128.153.13.196
User id  -------- Anonymous
Password -------- guests

SimTel20
26.0.0.74
Anonymous
guests

UXE.CSO.UIUC.EDU
128.174.5.54
anonymous
guests

UDM.UND.EDU
128.8.10.5
anonymous
guests

--------------------

*** end of Virus-L issue ***
