Return-Path: XPUM04@prime-a.central-services.umist.ac.uk Received: from G.SEI.CMU.EDU by ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.3) id AA03546; Tue, 19 Jun 90 07:23:30 -0400 Received: from SEI.CMU.EDU by g.sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.5) id AA28692; Tue, 19 Jun 90 07:23:29 -0400 Received: from nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.3) id AA01865; Tue, 19 Jun 90 07:23:22 -0400 Received: from sun.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by vax.NSFnet-Relay.AC.UK via Janet with NIFTP id aa05352; 19 Jun 90 9:40 BST From: Anthony Appleyard To: DAVIDF@cs.heriot-watt.ac.uk Date: Tue, 19 Jun 90 09:40:00 BST Message-Id: <$TGWFCWKBBCTJ at UMPA> Subject: Here is Virus-L vol 0 #0910 Virus-L Digest Sat, 10 Sep 88, Volume 0 : Issue #0910 Today's Topics Re: Easiest OS to infect ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Sep 88 16:34:16 EDT From: David.Slonosky@QUEENSU.CA Subject: Re: Easiest OS to infect In-Reply-To: >In reply to the comment that bigger is easier to infect I beg to differ. >Operating systems with layered architectures and rich file support are >easier to infect. They may also be easier to defend with. There is an >easy to use suite of public domain and sharware tools available. >I can only hope th So what do we mean by "layered architectures" and "rich file support"? As a relative neophyte in operating systems I would like to know. Does DOS have these features? __________________________________ | | David Slonosky/QueensU/CA,"",CA | Know thyself? | | If I knew myself, I'd run away. | |__________________________________| -------------------- *** end of Virus-L issue ***