Return-Path: XPUM04@prime-a.central-services.umist.ac.uk
Received: from G.SEI.CMU.EDU by ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.3)
        id AA21313; Thu, 7 Jun 90 13:38:08 -0400
Received: from SEI.CMU.EDU by g.sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.5)
        id AA14027; Thu, 7 Jun 90 13:37:59 -0400
Received: from nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.3)
        id AA01561; Thu, 7 Jun 90 13:37:51 -0400
Received: from sun.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by vax.NSFnet-Relay.AC.UK 
           via Janet with NIFTP  id aa21507; 7 Jun 90 17:43 BST
From: Anthony Appleyard <XPUM04@prime-a.central-services.umist.ac.uk>
To: DAVIDF@cs.heriot-watt.ac.uk
Date:         Thu, 07 Jun 90 15:38:20 BST 
Message-Id:   <$TGVGDBVHFKWT at UMPA>
Subject:      Virus-L vol 0 issue #0730



Virus-L Digest Sat, 30 Jul 88, Volume 0 : Issue #0730

Today's Topics

"Bug" in mailer?

------------------------------

Date:         Sat, 30 Jul 88 00:51:49 CST
Reply-To:     Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@LEHIIBM1>
Sender:       Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@LEHIIBM1>
From:         James Ford <JFORD1@UA1VM>
Subject:      "Bug" in mailer?

Well folks, I'm not sure who to send this to, but since  it  was  to  Loren
(LKK0  at  LEHIIBM1)  this  list  seems  to  be as good as any. Now, I have
absolutely NO knowledge about REXX, but when it  says  "recipient  OK",  it
should get there(?). I hate to sound like I'm turning this into MAILER-L or
REXX-L, but............ :-)

                           James Ford
                           JFORD1 (notice the "1") @UA1VM

P.S.  The "purge" key should come in handy to some folks.......
- -----------------  message follows ------------------------------------
>========================================================================
>Received: from LEHIIBM1.BITNET by UA1VM.BITNET (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTPid
>4492; Fri, 29 Jul 88 16:05:15 CST
>Received: from LEHIIBM1.BITNET by LEHIIBM1.BITNET (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTP id
>1358; Fri, 29 Jul 88 16:48:58 EDT 
>Date: Fri, 29 Jul 88 16:48:57 EDT"F
>From: Network Mailer <MAILER@LEHIIBM1.BITNET>
>To: JFORD1@UA1VM.BITNET
>Subject: mail delivery error

>Batch SMTP transaction log follows:

>220 LEHIIBM1.BITNET Columbia MAILER X1.25 BSMTP service ready.
>050 HELO UA1VM.BITNET
>250 LEHIIBM1.BITNET Hello UA1VM.BITNET
>050 TICK 4418
>250 4418 ... that's the ticket.
>050 MAIL FROM:<JFORD1@UA1VM.BITNET>
>250 <JFORD1@UA1VM.BITNET>... sender OK.
>050 RCPT TO:<lkk0@lehiibm1>
>250 <lkk0@lehiibm1>... recipient OK.
>050 DATA
>354 Start mail input.  End with <crlf>.<crlf>
>554-Mail not delivered to some or all recipients:
>554 No such local user: LKK0
>050 QUIT
>221 LEHIIBM1.BITNET Columbia MAILER BSMTP service done.

>Original message follows:

--------------------

*** end of Virus-L issue ***
Return-Path: XPUM04@prime-a.central-services.umist.ac.uk
Received: from G.SEI.CMU.EDU by ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.3)
        id AA21506; Thu, 7 Jun 90 15:09:43 -0400
Received: from SEI.CMU.EDU by g.sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.5)
        id AA15079; Thu, 7 Jun 90 15:09:42 -0400
Received: from nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.3)
        id AA08142; Thu, 7 Jun 90 15:09:34 -0400
Received: from sun.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by vax.NSFnet-Relay.AC.UK 
           via Janet with NIFTP  id aa19767; 7 Jun 90 17:12 BST
From: Anthony Appleyard <XPUM04@prime-a.central-services.umist.ac.uk>
To: DAVIDF@cs.heriot-watt.ac.uk
Date:         Thu, 07 Jun 90 15:38:20 BST 
Message-Id:   <$TGVGDBVHFKWT at UMPA>
Subject:      Virus-L vol 0 issue #0730



Virus-L Digest Sat, 30 Jul 88, Volume 0 : Issue #0730

Today's Topics

"Bug" in mailer?

------------------------------

Date:         Sat, 30 Jul 88 00:51:49 CST
Reply-To:     Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@LEHIIBM1>
Sender:       Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@LEHIIBM1>
From:         James Ford <JFORD1@UA1VM>
Subject:      "Bug" in mailer?

Well folks, I'm not sure who to send this to, but since  it  was  to  Loren
(LKK0  at  LEHIIBM1)  this  list  seems  to  be as good as any. Now, I have
absolutely NO knowledge about REXX, but when it  says  "recipient  OK",  it
should get there(?). I hate to sound like I'm turning this into MAILER-L or
REXX-L, but............ :-)

                           James Ford
                           JFORD1 (notice the "1") @UA1VM

P.S.  The "purge" key should come in handy to some folks.......
- -----------------  message follows ------------------------------------
>========================================================================
>Received: from LEHIIBM1.BITNET by UA1VM.BITNET (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTPid
>4492; Fri, 29 Jul 88 16:05:15 CST
>Received: from LEHIIBM1.BITNET by LEHIIBM1.BITNET (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTP id
>1358; Fri, 29 Jul 88 16:48:58 EDT 
>Date: Fri, 29 Jul 88 16:48:57 EDT"F
>From: Network Mailer <MAILER@LEHIIBM1.BITNET>
>To: JFORD1@UA1VM.BITNET
>Subject: mail delivery error

>Batch SMTP transaction log follows:

>220 LEHIIBM1.BITNET Columbia MAILER X1.25 BSMTP service ready.
>050 HELO UA1VM.BITNET
>250 LEHIIBM1.BITNET Hello UA1VM.BITNET
>050 TICK 4418
>250 4418 ... that's the ticket.
>050 MAIL FROM:<JFORD1@UA1VM.BITNET>
>250 <JFORD1@UA1VM.BITNET>... sender OK.
>050 RCPT TO:<lkk0@lehiibm1>
>250 <lkk0@lehiibm1>... recipient OK.
>050 DATA
>354 Start mail input.  End with <crlf>.<crlf>
>554-Mail not delivered to some or all recipients:
>554 No such local user: LKK0
>050 QUIT
>221 LEHIIBM1.BITNET Columbia MAILER BSMTP service done.

>Original message follows:

--------------------

*** end of Virus-L issue ***
Return-Path: XPUM04@prime-a.central-services.umist.ac.uk
Received: from G.SEI.CMU.EDU by ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.3)
        id AA25841; Tue, 12 Jun 90 06:37:19 -0400
Received: from SEI.CMU.EDU by g.sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.5)
        id AA12944; Tue, 12 Jun 90 06:37:16 -0400
Received: from nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by sei.cmu.edu (5.61/2.3)
        id AA04190; Tue, 12 Jun 90 06:37:08 -0400
Received: from sun.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by vax.NSFnet-Relay.AC.UK 
           via Janet with NIFTP  id aa09438; 12 Jun 90 11:07 BST
From: Anthony Appleyard <XPUM04@prime-a.central-services.umist.ac.uk>
To: KRVW <@NSFnet-Relay.AC.UK:KRVW@sei.cmu.edu>
Date:         Tue, 12 Jun 90 11:05:16 BST 
Message-Id:   <$TGVTCZHTCBRB at UMPA>
Subject:      Virus-L vol 0 issue #0730



Virus-L Digest Sat, 30 Jul 88, Volume 0 : Issue #0730

Today's Topics

"Bug" in mailer?

------------------------------

Date:         Sat, 30 Jul 88 00:51:49 CST
Reply-To:     Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@LEHIIBM1>
Sender:       Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@LEHIIBM1>
From:         James Ford <JFORD1@UA1VM>
Subject:      "Bug" in mailer?

Well folks, I'm not sure who to send this to, but since  it  was  to  Loren
(LKK0  at  LEHIIBM1)  this  list  seems  to  be as good as any. Now, I have
absolutely NO knowledge about REXX, but when it  says  "recipient  OK",  it
should get there(?). I hate to sound like I'm turning this into MAILER-L or
REXX-L, but............ :-)

                           James Ford
                           JFORD1 (notice the "1") @UA1VM

P.S.  The "purge" key should come in handy to some folks.......
- -----------------  message follows ------------------------------------
>========================================================================
>Received: from LEHIIBM1.BITNET by UA1VM.BITNET (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTPid
>4492; Fri, 29 Jul 88 16:05:15 CST
>Received: from LEHIIBM1.BITNET by LEHIIBM1.BITNET (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTP id
>1358; Fri, 29 Jul 88 16:48:58 EDT 
>Date: Fri, 29 Jul 88 16:48:57 EDT"F
>From: Network Mailer <MAILER@LEHIIBM1.BITNET>
>To: JFORD1@UA1VM.BITNET
>Subject: mail delivery error

>Batch SMTP transaction log follows:

>220 LEHIIBM1.BITNET Columbia MAILER X1.25 BSMTP service ready.
>050 HELO UA1VM.BITNET
>250 LEHIIBM1.BITNET Hello UA1VM.BITNET
>050 TICK 4418
>250 4418 ... that's the ticket.
>050 MAIL FROM:<JFORD1@UA1VM.BITNET>
>250 <JFORD1@UA1VM.BITNET>... sender OK.
>050 RCPT TO:<lkk0@lehiibm1>
>250 <lkk0@lehiibm1>... recipient OK.
>050 DATA
>354 Start mail input.  End with <crlf>.<crlf>
>554-Mail not delivered to some or all recipients:
>554 No such local user: LKK0
>050 QUIT
>221 LEHIIBM1.BITNET Columbia MAILER BSMTP service done.

>Original message follows:

--------------------

*** end of Virus-L issue ***
